SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT RULES THAT LEGAL IMMIGRANTS MUST BE GRANTED EQUAL ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE

Jan. 5, 2012 (Boston, MA) - The Massachusetts State Supreme Judicial Court ruled unanimously today that the state cannot bar legal immigrants from accessing affordable health care coverage.  In deciding that legal immigrants are entitled to equal protection under the state constitution, the ruling reinstates the ability of approximately 40,000 low-income legal immigrants to enroll in the State's Commonwealth Care program, which provides subsidies for low-income, uninsured Massachusetts residents to purchase health insurance.

The suit, filed by Health Law Advocates (HLA) on behalf of tens of thousands of low-income Massachusetts legal immigrants, sought to strike down a law passed in 2009 eliminating access to Commonwealth Care for legal immigrants who had been in the U.S. for less than five years.   Massachusetts' historic health reform law passed in 2006 allowed legal immigrants who met eligibility requirements to obtain health insurance through the Commonwealth Care program.

Wendy Parmet, a Northeastern University School of Law professor who argued the case on behalf of the immigrants said "Our constitution prohibits the government from trying to solve its financial problems on the backs of a vulnerable class of people."

"Massachusetts justifiably takes great pride in our ‘first in nation' adoption of a health reform program that expanded access to quality healthcare to virtually all residents," said Matt Selig, Executive Director of HLA.  "It was critical that low-income immigrants, a group of already vulnerable, tax-paying residents, not be left behind."

As a result of the ruling, the Massachusetts state legislature will likely need to allocate additional budgetary resources to the state's Commonwealth Care program to meet its constitutional obligations.  Once that occurs, legal immigrants will once again be afforded access to affordable health insurance.

"Fiscal considerations alone cannot justify a State's invidious discrimination against aliens," notes the ruling.  "The discrimination against legal immigrants that its limiting language embodies violates their rights to equal protection under the Massachusetts constitution."

In this case, the Supreme Judicial Court took the unusual step of permitting the plaintiffs to file their lawsuit directly in the high court as opposed to requiring them to begin the litigation in a lower court.  HLA's attorneys successfully argued to the Justices that the issues in the case met the Court's standard permitting the direct filing of cases of "broad public importance."  As a result, HLA won invalidation of the Commonwealth's discriminatory policy sooner than if the Court had declined their request for direct review. 

In May, 2011, the Court made an initial ruling in the case that the Massachusetts Constitution virtually prohibits the Commonwealth from adopting policies that discriminate against legal immigrants by limiting their access to public benefits compared to citizens. The Commonwealth cannot use financial reasons to defend discrimination against legal immigrants, the Court said. 

In today's ruling, the Court affirmed that the State must allow legal immigrants back into Commonwealth Care because there was no justification for the discriminatory policy.

Today's ruling vindicates the position of HLA and the tens of thousands of low-income legal immigrants it represents. 

"From a legal perspective, it was clear that legal immigrants couldn't be denied access without violating the premise of equal protection," said Lorianne Sainsbury-Wong, an attorney with Health Law Advocates.  "This ruling is a victory not only for Massachusetts residents who were negatively impacted by the Commonwealth's decision to rescind coverage, but a message to all states that legal immigrants and other protected groups must be treated equally as we expand access to healthcare." 

Legal immigrants and providers expressed relief at today's ruling, noting that the resumption of coverage for needed medical services would limit unnecessary emergency room trips for routine care.

"The denial of access created significant disruptions in treatment for many of my patients" said Dr. Barbara Ogur, a physician with the Cambridge Health Alliance. "For the healthy ones, my concern has been that the lack of preventive care may ultimately lead to more advanced, less treatable, and more expensive to treat illness.  But for those with chronic illness, often the patients least able to navigate complex systems, and often the ones whose care team had been carefully developed over time, the disruption was especially difficult. "

The federal Affordable Care Act requires that as of 2014, federal subsidies to obtain private health insurance are to be made available for low-income, uninsured U.S residents including legal immigrants. Massachusetts had been providing a state subsidy to this population for this purpose as of 2006, as part of its implementation of Health Care Reform. Today's ruling requires the full resumption of those subsidies to low-income legal immigrants. The Massachusetts case may serve as a precedent as other states prepare to implement expanded health coverage in compliance with the Affordable Care Act and as many State's implement and weigh additional policies that discriminate against immigrants.

"We applaud the Supreme Judicial Court for their resounding decision that requires justice to prevail for the immigrants of Massachusetts," said Amy Whitcomb Slemmer, executive director of Health Care For All.  "We are grateful to our partners Health Law Advocates for their dogged leadership and determination on behalf of the plaintiffs.  Health Care For All will work tirelessly to insure that this decision is implemented as quickly and effectively as possible, and we welcome the opportunity to work with the members of the legislature and the Patrick Administration to make the Court's unambiguous mandate a reality."

Health Law Advocates (HLA) is a public interest law firm whose mission is to provide pro bono legal representation to low-income residents experiencing difficulty accessing or paying for needed medical services. HLA is committed to ensuring universal access to quality health care in Massachusetts, particularly for those who are most at risk due to such factors as race, gender, disability, age, or geographic location. With its partner organization, Health Care For All, HLA combines legal expertise with grassroots organizing and policy reform to advance the statewide movement for universal health care access.

 

Suggested Articles

The profit margins and management of Community Health Group raise questions about oversight of managed care insurers.

Financial experts are warning practices about the pitfalls of promoting medical credit cards to their patients.

A proposed rule issued by HHS on Tuesday would expand short-term coverage, a move Seema Verma said will have "virtually no impact" on ACA premiums.