Researcher studies ROI on wellness programs

For ages, the healthcare industry has conducted a raging internal debate as to how much programs like disease management, employee wellness and more recently, pay-for-performance actually deliver. Some claimed ROI of as much as 30-to-1 on investment, figures critics vigorously challenged. Today backers are more likely to claim 2-to-1 or 4-to-1 returns, but they're still arguing such programs are no-brainers financially.

Hoping to sort out truth from fiction regarding such programs, a Cincinnati researcher has kicked off a project designed to study the actual return on investment on these types of cost-savings efforts. Thomas Wilson of the Population Health Impact Institute is developing an accreditation program to verify that such programs' ROI claims have some teeth.

When examining these programs, the Population Health initiative will look at the transparency of their methods, statistical significance of metrics they use to measure success and validity of the comparison groups they use.

To learn more about this research:
- read this Business Courier of Cincinnati article

Related Articles:
Designing smart disease management programs. Report
L.A. charity system saves millions with disease management. Report
CMS extends pay-for-performance program. Report
Exclusive: How to make P4P work. Interview

Suggested Articles

The profit margins and management of Community Health Group raise questions about oversight of managed care insurers.

Financial experts are warning practices about the pitfalls of promoting medical credit cards to their patients.

A proposed rule issued by HHS on Tuesday would expand short-term coverage, a move Seema Verma said will have "virtually no impact" on ACA premiums.