California Opt-Out Upheld – Lower Court Dismisses Lawsuit


On Friday, October 8, 2010, the California Superior Court in San Francisco granted summary judgment in favor of
both California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and the California Association of Nurse Anesthetists (CANA),
affirming California’s opt-out of the federal physician supervision requirement for nurse anesthetists.

At the conclusion of the October 8 hearing, the presiding judge announced his finding that California state law does
not require that nurse anesthetists be supervised by a physician. The judge further found that the governor did not
abuse his discretion in concluding that the opt-out was consistent with state law. The court therefore ruled against
the California Society of Anesthesiologists (CSA) and the California Medical Association (CMA), who filed the lawsuit
in February 2010. A written order reflecting the court’s findings and decision will not be finalized for several days.

The CSA and CMA are reviewing their options, including appealing the ruling. Meanwhile, California’s opt-out
remains in effect.

Additional Background
California opted out in July 2009. Gov. Schwarzenegger informed the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
(CMS) of the opt-out in a letter that stated that after “[h]aving consulted with the California Board of Medicine and
California Board of Registered Nursing and having determined that this exemption is consistent with state law, I have concluded that it is in the interests of the people of California to opt out of this requirement.”

The CSA and CMA lawsuit requested (1) that “the Court issue a writ of mandate commanding Respondent Governor
Schwarzenegger to withdraw the ‘opt-out’ letter said Respondent submitted to CMS in or about June 2009, and to
take no further action to effect an opt-out under [federal regulation]”; and (2) that “the Court declare that, under
California law, a CRNA is not authorized to administer anesthesia except under the supervision of a physician.”
Subsequently, CANA was granted permission to intervene as a party to the lawsuit. The AANA filed a declaration in
the case in support of the governor’s and CANA’s position.

Suggested Articles

The profit margins and management of Community Health Group raise questions about oversight of managed care insurers.

Financial experts are warning practices about the pitfalls of promoting medical credit cards to their patients.

A proposed rule issued by HHS on Tuesday would expand short-term coverage, a move Seema Verma said will have "virtually no impact" on ACA premiums.