CA may require MDs to explain end-of-life options

Under a new measure approved this week by state legislators, physicians who diagnose a patient with a terminal illness would be required to tell them right away about their right to refuse or withdraw from life-sustaining treatment. The bill has proved controversial, with some opponents arguing that the requirement intrudes on the doctor-patient relationship at a very delicate moment. Sen. Sam Aanestad, an oral surgeon, noted that some options that doctors would have to explain wouldn't be needed right away, or possibly for years. He argues that the bill might even hasten the death of depressed patients, who might give up before all worthwhile treatment options are attempted. However, supporters like Sen. Sheila Kuehl contend that the bill is a modest attempt to make sure terminal patients' questions are answered and that they know all of their options. The bill, which was just passed by the Senate, will go back to the Assembly for approval of minor amendments, then will be sent to the governor.

To learn more about the bill:
- read this Los Angeles Times article

Related Articles:
Study: ICU docs discuss end-of-life with blacks less often
Minorities seek aggressive end-of-life care

Suggested Articles

The profit margins and management of Community Health Group raise questions about oversight of managed care insurers.

Financial experts are warning practices about the pitfalls of promoting medical credit cards to their patients.

A proposed rule issued by HHS on Tuesday would expand short-term coverage, a move Seema Verma said will have "virtually no impact" on ACA premiums.