AZ allows law limiting choice of experts in medical practice suits

The Arizona Supreme Court has voted to uphold a 2005 law that limited who qualifies as an expert patients can enlist in their defense during medical malpractice suits.

The statute states that anyone who wants to testify as an expert witness against a physician in such a suit must be a licensed healthcare provider, a specialist in the same area as the defendant and actively practicing or teaching in that area.

Originally, the state court of appeals had ruled, in 2008, that the teaching or practicing requirement was unconstitutional, given that the Supreme Court's rules of evidence only required that experts by qualified by "knowledge, skill, experience, training or education."

However, the Supreme Court ruled that while as a body, it generally had the right to decide how trials are conducted, it concluded that the legislature was permitted to make "substantive" policy changes dictating what plaintiffs in civil suits must prove to win cases.

To learn more about the decision:
- read this Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report piece

Related Articles:
TX may change medical malpractice law
Judge overturns GA's medical malpractice damages limit
NC will limit some medical malpractice awards
Doctor's blog kills malpractice defense

Suggested Articles

The profit margins and management of Community Health Group raise questions about oversight of managed care insurers.

Financial experts are warning practices about the pitfalls of promoting medical credit cards to their patients.

A proposed rule issued by HHS on Tuesday would expand short-term coverage, a move Seema Verma said will have "virtually no impact" on ACA premiums.