Not all mergers are created equal

Mergers and acquisitions continue to be a hot topic in the healthcare industry as M&A activity rises and the government flexes its regulatory muscle, but amid all the developments it's important to note that not all mergers are created equal.

A "good" merger is one that allows providers to increase healthcare value to the benefit of the community, whereas a "bad" merger is the type that regulators have increasingly sought to prevent or dismantle--one that discourages competition, write Leemore S. Dafney, Ph.D., and Thomas H. Lee, M.D., in an opinion piece for the New England Journal of Medicine.

But while good mergers can help the healthcare industry transition to value-based care by allowing providers to pursue collaborative care models, providers have shown little to no hard evidence that their mergers have actually lowered costs or improved outcomes, the authors say. >> Read the full article at FierceHealthcare

 

Suggested Articles

Nurx raised an additional $22.5 million in funding in May. Find out why CEO Varsha Rao believes telehealth will not go back to pre-COVID-19 levels.

Providers are hoping for another executive order from President Trump to give more relief from COVID-19 as talks in Congress have faltered.

People who sign up for individual market plans during special enrollment periods face higher costs, a new study shows.