Is Blue Button a step backward?; No such thing as the 'perfect EHR';

> Writing on the HL7 Standards blog, Rob Brull, a certified HL7 CDA specialist and product manager for Corepoint Health, wonders if Blue Button interoperability is a step backward with regard to interoperability. "Blue Button output is not machine-readable," he writes. "If a patient takes Blue Button output to a provider, the health information will have to be manually entered into the [electronic health record] by the staff." Blog post

> Robert Rowley, M.D., medical director for Practice Fusion, says in a recent blog post that patients should be the ones controlling "cradle-to-grave" patient health records. "For individually identifiable health data--a patient's own health record, aggregated from across the entire landscape--clearly the person managing viewing permissions needs to be the patient directly," he writes. Post

> The "perfect EHR" is a myth, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center CIO John Halamka writes in a recent blog post. Halamka says users who are unhappy with their product's performance buy into it, though. "Users believe the grass will be greener by selecting another EHR," he writes. "I believe that what a provider perceives as a better EHR often represents tradeoffs in functionality." Post

And Finally... Nothing says romance like rollback prices. Article

Suggested Articles

Roche, which already owned a 12.6% stake in Flatiron Health, has agreed to buy the health IT company for $1.9 billion.

Allscripts managed to acquire two EHR platforms for just $50 million by selling off a portion of McKesson's portfolio for as much as $235 million.

Artificial intelligence could help physicians predict a patient's risk of developing a deadly infection.