FierceHealthcare FierceHealthIT FierceMobileHealthcare FierceHealthPayer
FierceHealthFinance FierceEMR FiercePracticeManagemtn Hospital Impact

Wake up call: Sleepy residents don't make worse surgeons, study says

Tired surgery residents aren't worse surgeons than their better-rested peers, according to a study published in the Journal of Surgical Research.

This finding, based on a review of the outcomes of 2,900 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, which involve removing the gall bladder, and 1,700 appendectomies performed by residents between July 2003 and March 2009, contradicts the commonly held assumption that fatigued and overworked residents can pose a safety threat to patients.

The researchers compared surgery results--including complication rates, conversion to open operation, length of surgery, and mortality--from the first 16 hours of a physician's shift with those performed in the last eight hours of a typical 24-hour shift, when residents would likely be more exhausted. The outcomes came from County Harbor-UCLA Medical Center.

The revelation chips away at the underlying assumptions behind the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's recent proposal that first year residents' work hours be cut from 24 to 16 hours and the Institute of Medicine's recent recommendation that on-call residents be allowed five hours of rest time after 16 hours of work.

"The rationale is that this [new requirement] would intuitively lead to better-rested medical residents who would take care of patients more safely," Dr. Christian de Virgilio, a study co-author and researcher at Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, told the Daily Breeze. "We haven't seen that that's necessarily the case."

The study suggests that limiting resident shifts to 16 hours of work is unlikely to improve surgical outcomes for the two most commonly performed surgeries, de Virgilio told Physorg.com. He opposes cutting the hours per day a resident may be available for surgical training, because they could miss out on critical aspects of a patient's care. Plus, it would increase the costs and length of surgical training, which can take 10 to 15 years.

To learn more:
- see the abstract in the Journal of Surgical Research
- see the New England Journal of Medicine abstract
- read the Daily Breeze article
- check out the Physorg.com article

Related Stories:
Proposed resident guidelines aim to protect patients while preserving education
Hourly limits for surgical residents in Switzerland negatively impact training, patient safety
Study: Residents work too many hours

SHARE WITH:
Email Twitter Facebook LinkedIn StumbleUpon
Get Your FREE FierceHealthcare Email Newsletter:
Comments (1) | Post a comment

Comments

Even if the rate of error is not increased after 18 to 24 hours of work, what other profession, trade or occupation requires its trainees to work 24 to 36 to 48 hours without adequate, or at times, NO sleep? How ironic that many of these physicians-in-training will be in the future, admonishing patients for getting inadequate rest after surgery. Physicians are HUMAN BEINGS who deserve the right to a reasonable work schedule, time for personal rest and relaxation, and SLEEP. As a nurse with nearly 40 years of experience, I have seen the toll that dehumanizing work hours have on the physical and psychological well-being of residents AND physicians in practice. Also, there IS an increased incidence of auto accidents and MVA related deaths reported for residents who are driving home after long call hours. So, adverse outcomes ARE more frequent (at least for physicians) after long work hours. This fact alone should provide physician educators with sufficient reason to endorse shorter work hours.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.