FEATURES >> YouTube | Top acute-care hospitals | Women in Health IT | Top BlackBerry Apps | Commentary
TOPICS >> Stimulus | Health Reform | CMS News | Finance | EMRs | Mobile Healthcare | Hospital Leadership Blog
Vitamins E, C ineffective in preventing heart disease
Comments
I am greatly saddened by this paper and by the results that are offered. As a wellness practioner, (post-doctoral degree in health and wellness) I have way too many questions to write here; but here are a few. What was the dosage of Vitamins E and C? What was the form? Did they just use apha-tocopherol or all of vitamin E? Did they just use ascorbate as vitamin C? I ask because the medical definition of vitamins E and C are very different from any other logical source of information. In fact, Linus Pauling was adamant that ascorbate was one part of Vitamin C but by itself it was extremely ineffective. It would not even cure scurvy by itself but a raw potato, having very little vitamin C but having the whole vitamin, would allow a person to slowly recover.
Does no one else get the fact that 23 AND 39 out of about 7,300 is clinically insignificant and cannot be linked to ANYTHING? It certainly cannot be linked to a statement that your are 74% more likely to have a bleeding stroke.
May I make a suggestion? Since the NIH, the JAMA the BMJ and WHO all show that the incidence and the severity of stroke, heart attack and related cardiovascular diseases have gone up every year, can we ask these 15,000 doctors to divide up and some take statins and some take vitamin E and C? At least their vitamins will do no harm.





