Most Popular Stories
- IOM: Chronic conditions a public health 'crisis'
- Healthcare jobs will grow the fastest of all industries
- New Jersey a hotbed for hospital consolidation
- Hospitals ready for value-based purchasing with higher patient satisfaction
- U of California students launch telehealth pilot for diabetes
- MGMA protests 5010-related payment delays, demands government action
Featured Jobs
-
ICD-10 Revenue Cycle, Manager
Meditology Services - Atlanta, GA -
Epic Ambulatory Beacon Consultant
Meditology Services - NC
Events
- Wharton Health Care Business Conference
Feb 16-17 — Philadelphia, PA - 3rd Healthcare IT Innovation Asia
Mar 14-15 2012 — Singapore - AHIP's Institute 2012
June 20-22 — Salt Lake City, UT - ICD-10 Reality Check - Breakfast Panel at HiMSS 2012!
February 22, 2012
Paid Research Reports
- Electronic health records: getting it right first time
- Cloud Computing Adoption In The APAC Life Sciences Industry
- Stakeholder Opinions: Ophthalmology - Leading brands under threat
- Genomics, Proteomics and Metabolomics in Diagnostics: Market landscape, innovative technologies and future outlook
- Healthcare Regulatory Update: The United Arab Emirates
- Point of Care Testing: Evaluating the return to evidence based medicine, novel technologies and the competitive landscape
Free Newsletter
FierceHealthcare is the leading source of healthcare management news for healthcare industry executives. Join 50,000+ healthcare industry insiders who get FierceHealthcare via daily email. Sign up today!
Popular Topics
Unnecessary tests potentially cost Massachusetts millions
Unnecessary imaging tests and high reimbursement rates on those tests may have cost MassHealth--the Massachusetts Medicaid program--millions of dollars, an auditor for the state has found.
In 2009 alone, MassHealth paid more than $30 million for 582,000 advanced imaging claims, according to a 47-page report published by auditor Joe DeNucci this week. Many of the patients who underwent CT scans or MRIs did so on advice from doctors practicing "self-referral"--sending patients to undergo tests conducted by doctors with a financial interest at stake--according to the Boston Globe's "White Coat Notes."
"Our review found that unlike many states, Massachusetts does not regulate self-referral for advanced imaging services to prohibit or, at least, disclose self-referrals to patients, which could potentially result in significant negative consequences," the report said.
Additionally, the state's Medicaid reimbursement rate for imaging is higher than the federal Medicare reimbursement rate. Due to that discrepancy, it was determined that the state lost out on roughly $8.5 million in savings from fiscal year 2007 to FY09 for dual eligible patients--Medicaid patients who also underwent the tests through Medicare.
"The Medicare reimbursement rates for advanced imaging as set by CMS have been reduced multiple times in recent years, and more restrictive requirements for advanced imaging are proposed in the 2010 federal budget," the report stated. "[In contrast] MassHealth has had a net increase in reimbursement rates for advanced imaging services in recent years, and DHCFP sets the reimbursement rates for MassHealth using a different methodology than CMS does for Medicare."
To learn more:
- here's the report (.pdf)
- read this Boston Globe brief
- check out this press release from DeNucci's office
Related Articles:
In-house imaging referral rules will tighten up a notch
Imaging coalition says White House supports radiology benefit managers
GAO to study link between physician self-referral, Medicare imaging costs
Study: Radiologists losing control of imaging industry
GAO report recommends imaging cost controls
Related Stories
- Press Release: U.S. Joins Suit Against Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Boehringer Ingelheim Roxane
- Hospital to pay $3M over improper billing charges
- State proposes Medicare-Medicaid integration, ACO partnerships
- Medicare, Medicaid cuts threaten hospitals' economic impact
- Healthcare CEOs want raised Medicare eligibility age to curb costs
- What the Cut, Cap, Balance Act means for hospitals
- AHA blasts Medicare, Medicaid cuts to fix deficit
- Doc groups warn global federal cuts will damage care delivery
- Medicaid enrollees may start paying premiums, ER co-pays
- Health plans open community-based clinics to cut hospital costs
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site Map
| Editors | List in Marketplace | Supplier in MarketplaceTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceEnergy | FierceSmartGrid | FierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceHealthPayer | FiercePracticeManagement | FierceEMR | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceGovernment | FierceHomelandSecurity | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceMedicalDevices | FierceDrugDelivery | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceEnterpriseCommunications | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe | FierceCable© 2011 FierceMarkets. All rights reserved. |
![]() |
