Most Popular Stories
- Healthcare jobs will grow the fastest of all industries
- Hospitals lose reimbursement for 'unnecessary' ER visits
- Online tools, social media ease clinical recruiting, research
- Measuring ROI key to EHR success, adoption
- eHealth Initiative issues IT recommendations for ACOs
- Patient satisfaction equal for physician, hospitalist care
Featured Jobs
-
Electronic Health Records Application Support Manager RN-New Year New Career
Avanti on behalf of Respected Health System - San Francisco, CA -
ICD-10 Revenue Cycle, Manager
Meditology Services - Atlanta, GA -
Epic Ambulatory Beacon Consultant
Meditology Services - NC
Events
- ICD-10 Reality Check - Breakfast Panel at HiMSS 2012!
February 22, 2012 - IHI's Transforming the Primary Care Practice
May 1-3, 2012 — San Diego, CA - From IHI: The Patient Experience Seminar
March 27-28 — Boston, MA - 3rd Healthcare IT Innovation Asia
Mar 14-15 2012 — Singapore
Paid Research Reports
- Electronic health records: getting it right first time
- Cloud Computing Adoption In The APAC Life Sciences Industry
- Stakeholder Opinions: Ophthalmology - Leading brands under threat
- Genomics, Proteomics and Metabolomics in Diagnostics: Market landscape, innovative technologies and future outlook
- Healthcare Regulatory Update: The United Arab Emirates
- Point of Care Testing: Evaluating the return to evidence based medicine, novel technologies and the competitive landscape
Free Newsletter
FierceHealthcare is the leading source of healthcare management news for healthcare industry executives. Join 50,000+ healthcare industry insiders who get FierceHealthcare via daily email. Sign up today!
Popular Topics
Letter: Pricing Transparency
There are several issues here. First, is the hospital efficiently managed? If its costs are excessive because it is poorly run, it is unreasonable to expect anyone, insured or otherwise, to compensate it for its inefficiency. Second, does it have any idea what its costs are? Many hospital accounting systems aren't very good. If it could credibly quantify its costs and communicate them to both uninsured patients and third party payers, it would be helpful. While Medicare may dictate prices that the hospital feels it must accept due to the high number of patients insured by the program, it should be able to negotiate more reasonable payment terms with private insurers. Again, a robust accounting system would be helpful in negotiations. With respect to the uninsured, I just don't think it is reasonable to charge them more that about 10 to 15 percent above what it accepts from private insurance for the same service or, if less, 25 percent above Medicare for the same set of services even if the patient is wealthy. I suggest that hospital executives might ask themselves how they would feel if they were on the receiving end of bills to the uninsured knowing what the hospital routinely accepts as full payment from insurers, including Medicare. If Medicare is paying mostly on the basis of DRG's and private insurers are paying either on a case rate or per diem basis (depending on the treatment), the same approach should be used for the uninsured.
If a hospital cannot operate within a reasonable pricing environment, it might consider merging with another hospital or group to become a larger entity with more negotiating leverage. If it is a just plain inefficient, high cost provider, it should downsize or close. Conversely, efficiently run hospitals could embrace pricing transparency and fair treatment of all patients when it comes to billing to drive market share. Ideally, it should work with doctors, anesthesiologists, imaging centers, rehab centers, etc. to offer package pricing for a complete episode of care for procedures that can be scheduled in advance and for services that are not delivered under emergency conditions. I am keenly interested in the issue of pricing transparency including efforts by insurers to disclose actual payment rates to insured patients not just for hospital charges but for all medical services. If there are confidentiality agreements that hospitals impose on insurers to preclude pricing transparency on the part of insurers, those agreements should be eliminated or even outlawed via legislation if necessary.
Barry Carol
Related Stories
- Cost-shifting increases family spending by almost $1,800 annually
- Public would support coordinated care models, survey shows
- More hospitals place patients on observation
- Hospital execs sweat the details of healthcare reform
- Hospital stock prices improving, but will they keep it up?
- Hospital industry, White House announce $155B cost-cutting agreement
- Doctors, researchers slam MA reforms as national model
- Trend: Hospital layoffs mounting
- NJ law caps hospital prices for uninsured
- Medicare to expand 'no-pay' list
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site Map
| Editors | List in Marketplace | Supplier in MarketplaceTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceEnergy | FierceSmartGrid | FierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceHealthPayer | FiercePracticeManagement | FierceEMR | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceGovernment | FierceHomelandSecurity | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceMedicalDevices | FierceDrugDelivery | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceEnterpriseCommunications | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe | FierceCable© 2011 FierceMarkets. All rights reserved. |
![]() |
