FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceFierceEMRHospital ImpactFierceMobileHealthcare   FiercePharma

Drug companies plan to disclose grant funding

Tools
Tags
Boston Scientific
Medtronic
Schering-Plough
AstraZeneca
Herb Kohl
Eli Lilly
pharmaceutical companies
Charles Grassley
Schering Plough

Hoping to stave off outside regulation by Congress, a group of the nation's largest drug and device manufacturers have put forth plans to publicly disclose the grants they make to outside organizations. In a recent letter to 15 such companies, Sen Chuck Grassley (R-IA) noted that Eli Lilly already discloses the grants it makes for continuing medical education programs, and asked them to explain why they weren't making similar efforts.

In response to Grassley's letter, virtually all of the companies outlined disclosure plans, though the plans differ in the details. For example, Medtronic said it will post payments for professional meetings and patient groups on its site beginning May 1, and AstraZeneca will follow its lead starting Aug. 1. Boston Scientific, for its part, said it would soon disclose certain payments to physicians, a particularly newsworthy concession. The only holdout was Schering-Plough, which told Grassley that it didn't have plans to publish its charitable contributions anytime soon.

Sen. Grassley, along with Sen. Herb Kohl (D-WI) already have introduced legislation that would require drug and device makers to disclose anything of value given to doctors, including not only payments, but also gifts and travel. However, they're really hoping to see these industries disclose medical education payments, too.

To learn more about the drug and device makers' plans:
- read this Associated Press piece

Related Articles:
Senate investigates pharma influence on CME
Case study: NY hospital drops pharma CME funding

SPOTLIGHT: Pharma's influence in continuing medical education.
Doctors weigh in on the pros and cons of accepting drug/device freebies

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceHealthcare Email Newsletter:
Comments (1) | Post a comment

Comments

A step in the right direction. It is not enough to list the companies for which a speaker or scientist making a pitch for a drug has affiliation to or more strongly put- "filial loyalty". It is necessary to mention the dollar amounts and the frequency of payouts. When you sit in some meetings and listen to the "thought leaders" it is really hard to believe how comfortable they are on those "panelist chairs" when being asked direct questions about the problem drugs they passionately endorse. A lot of sunshine is badly needed in this arena.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.