FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceFierceEMRHospital ImpactFierceMobileHealthcare   FiercePharma

CVS Caremark attacked for allegedly deceptive drug ads

Tools
Tags
Eli Lilly
Drug Marketing
Deceptive Marketing
Cymbalta
Consumer Reports
CVS Caremark
AstraZeneca

In what was supposed to be a bit of routine business, CVS Caremark recently sent out a series of promotional mailings to doctors on behalf of a handful of major drugmakers, including Eli Lilly, Merck, AstraZeneca, Bayer and others. The mailings, which are marked "Confidential--May Include Protected Health Information,"are designed to look like the materials doctors get when a patient hasn't refilled a drug, or might be getting addictive medication scripts refilled too often.

However, as it turns out, the letters were nothing of the kind. They're actually advertising--marked, CVS Caremark and the pharmas say, in three separate locations--despite looking like materials designed to assist doctors with tracking in this case.

One notice that fell into the hands of Dr. Daniel Carlat, a Massachusetts psychiatrist, promoted the use of the Eli Lilly antidepressant Cymbalta. The Lilly letter stressed the benefits of using Cymbalta to treat fibromyalgia, a use which was recently approved by the FDA. Carlat, who has since written to Lilly to protest the practice, has lashed out at the company for what he sees as deceptive marketing, and dubbed CVS Caremark a "pharmacy whore" for taking Big Pharma money to distribute these materials.

Carlat is one of many physicians who have complained about such mailings, which critics say are deceptive and inappropriate marketing approaches.

"This kind of drug marketing should simply be forbidden," Steven Findlay, senior health policy analyst at Consumers Union, told the Indianapolis Star. "It does not fully inform doctors about drug treatment choices." (Consumers Union publishes famed consumer ratings publication Consumer Reports.)

To learn more about this advertising:
- read this Indianapolis Star piece

Related Articles:
IFPMA institutes new pharma marketing rules
Pharma sees marketing gold in iPhone apps
NIH doctors slam Lilly's marketing tactics

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceHealthcare Email Newsletter:
Comments (3) | Post a comment

Comments

Well, what do you expect from a company that bases EVERY decision on how much money it can add to the bottom line. The chain is more concerned with number of rx's filled per hour than safety. They SAY that safety is important, but EVERY measurement, every emphasis is on filling more and more prescriptions.
Pharmacy Whore fits well.....

Give them hell, no good SOBs. What nerve to take drug money and then try to influence prescribing patterns. CVS has one thought in mind, how to make more money and take advantage of the public. They did it before with their imprinted Rx bags from Claritin. I wouldn't trust any Pharma companies. They all have unethical standards whether its advertsing, detailing or promoting their drugs. Companies like Merck, Lilly, Abbott and Pzizer to mention a few. They all need to be scooped up.

It's just advertising. Why spend the time and energy complaining about something so trivial unless some organization intends to ban pharmaceutical advertising?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.