FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceFierceEMRHospital ImpactFierceMobileHealthcare   FiercePharma

COBRA unaffordable for many

Tools
Tags
uninsured
Insurance
Commonwealth Fund
COBRA

According to the Commonwealth Fund, most workers who lose their jobs cannot afford to continue their healthcare coverage through COBRA, the 1985 law that allows workers to keep their job-based health benefits for up to 18 months if they can pay the entire premium. Just last year, the average annual cost for premiums of individuals using COBRA was just over $4,700; for families, that cost came to $12,680 a year.

While some are calling for federal assistance for those using COBRA, that doesn't completely solve the problem of the unemployed becoming the uninsured. About 38 percent of workers who lose their jobs don't even qualify for COBRA because their work doesn't offer employment-based coverage in the first place, or their work isn't required to offer COBRA as an option, the Commonwealth Fund's analysis finds.

In an attempt to partially remedy the situation, House Democrats want $30 billion of their proposed two-year stimulus plan to go toward subsidizing COBRA for those who have lost their jobs by 65 percent for one year.

For more:
- read this Modern Healthcare article (reg. req.)

Bookmark and Share
Get Your FREE FierceHealthcare Email Newsletter:
Comments (3) | Post a comment

Comments

Throwing more money into the defunct third party system is NOT going to solve the healthcare crisis.It is not even going to address the most immediate problems like the scenario described in the article above.
We have reached a tipping point. We have some options. 1) Ban third party insurance and restore the sacred trust between doctors and patients (it will cut down costs by around 50% immediately) 2) Permit a two /three tier healthcare combined with no-fault malpractice insurance. 3) Create a catastrophic healthcare coverage with defined basic life saving benefits and appeal to a binding arbitration panel for expensive procedures or chronic care care costing over a certain dollar amount (which can change depending on the annual budget and available dollars) . This panel needs to be composed 50% by ethicists, clergy, citizens, health care economists and 50% by medical doctors. The mix of arbiters should be such that their decisions should reflect on the local taxes collected in the community and the state. If there is no fiscal responsibility people will make irrational choices 4)Cash for service system in combination with voluntary insurance programs that can co-exist for all other care including chronic diseases. 5) Insurance companies and Big Pharma should be required by law to compete in the open market 6) Healthcare related lobbying likely to raise costs should be banned.
If we do not do this, our country cannot remain a viable player in the competitive world. Our industries are reeling under the unbridled health care costs. We owe it to our children to use this very rare opportunity to make radical and sustainable changes to healthcare policy. We actually have no choice but to make painful choices. Gone are the days of employer covered healthcare. "Health and its care" is the responsibility of the community, the state and the country..not that of employers.

But if it's a group HSA and HDHP, the employee would be paying a much lower amount to maintain the HDHP, maintaining catastrophic coverage. Furthermore, the payments can be made from HSA savings.

"According to the Commonwealth Fund, most workers who lose their jobs cannot afford to continue their healthcare coverage through COBRA."

Duh! Talk about a no-brainer. Assuming that most Americans are living from paycheck to paycheck, and are in the process of maxing out their credit cards once that paycheck disappears, of course they are not going to be able to afford a thousand dollars or more a month to continue their health insurance sans any kind of employer subsidy.
Our healthcare system today is being financed by blue smoke and mirrors, chewing gum and scotch tape.
Bringing the working-age population into Medicare, even with its 80/20 provision, will, I believe, result in physicians and hospitals realizing significantly higher revenues at significantly lower collection costs. And employers will be spared the burden of paying for their employees' health insurance. Higher taxes - sure. But we, as citizens, will realize greater benefits. Certainly more benefits than we are getting from those two failed wars that Dubyah started for no reason, or the tens of billions of dollars flowing to the US auto industry, which will be bankrupt or dissolved within 18 months regardless of any government bailout.
If there is any upside to the present economic crisis, it is that it gives the powers that be the ability to make radical changes (pardon the word 'radical')that would be verboten in quieter, more prosperous times.
Howard

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.