Most Popular Stories
- Hospitals lose reimbursement for 'unnecessary' ER visits
- Healthcare jobs will grow the fastest of all industries
- Online tools, social media ease clinical recruiting, research
- Hospital exec arrested in $116M Medicare scheme
- Patient satisfaction equal for physician, hospitalist care
- New Hospital Compare data shows disparity in blood infection rates
Featured Jobs
-
Epic Ambulatory Beacon Consultant
Meditology Services - NC -
Electronic Health Records Application Support Manager RN-New Year New Career
Avanti on behalf of Respected Health System - San Francisco, CA -
ICD-10 Revenue Cycle, Manager
Meditology Services - Atlanta, GA
Events
- From IHI: The Patient Experience Seminar
March 27-28 — Boston, MA - ICD-10 Reality Check - Breakfast Panel at HiMSS 2012!
February 22, 2012 - Medicare Risk Adjusted Revenue and Plan Payments
April 12 - 13, 2012 — Baltimore, MD - Medical Devices Summit 2012
March 6-7 2012 — The Boston Park Plaza Hotel & Towers, Boston, MA
Paid Research Reports
- Electronic health records: getting it right first time
- Cloud Computing Adoption In The APAC Life Sciences Industry
- Stakeholder Opinions: Ophthalmology - Leading brands under threat
- Genomics, Proteomics and Metabolomics in Diagnostics: Market landscape, innovative technologies and future outlook
- Healthcare Regulatory Update: The United Arab Emirates
- Point of Care Testing: Evaluating the return to evidence based medicine, novel technologies and the competitive landscape
Free Newsletter
FierceHealthcare is the leading source of healthcare management news for healthcare industry executives. Join 50,000+ healthcare industry insiders who get FierceHealthcare via daily email. Sign up today!
Popular Topics
CA providers, officials fight over balance billing
The battle is on in California over the issue of when it's legal to balance-bill patients, with providers contending that they need to issue such bills when health plans underpay. The dispute comes because in that state, the law is apparently unclear on a key issue--whether providers who don't contract with a health plan can balance-bill patients who see them as out-of-network providers.
At present, the California Department of Managed Health Care is suing Prime Healthcare Services in an effort to stop the hospital network from billing patients for out-of-network emergency care fees. The DMHC contends that Prime illegally billed up to 6,000 Kaiser Permanente members for outstanding balances, as well as members of other health plans. (It doesn't help matters any, politically, that Prime has made a routine practice of dropping managed care contracts when it acquires a hospital, seemingly in an effort to get higher out-of-network reimbursement rates.) The DMHC argues that state law bans balance billing for emergency care because doctors and hospitals have an implied contract to treat patients in emergencies--as required by EMTALA--which gives insurers the obligation to pay for services.
Providers don't care for the DMHC's reasoning, according to AMA newspaper American Medical News. They say that under this interpretation of the law, health plans can unilaterally decide what they're going to pay, and are likely to pay unfair rates for emergency services. They note that balance billing for emergency services was found legal under a 2006 state appeals court ruling, which held that "contracting providers" who can't balance bill are only those with an actual contract.
Meanwhile, the DMHC continues to press forward with regs banning all balance billing, as mandated by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) in 2006.
To learn more about this dispute:
- read this AMNews piece
Related Articles:
CA sues Prime Healthcare for balance-billing insured patients
CA law would ban balance billing for ED services
Schwarzenegger orders end to balance billing
Related Stories
- Balance billing ban upheld
- Billing process linked to long-term patient satisfaction
- Patient sues over balance billing
- ACLU: Catholic hospitals that deny life-saving abortions violate EMTALA
- Balance billing interpretations focus of legal battle
- Woman wins $200K for hospital EMTALA violation
- CMS updates criteria for EMTALA waivers
- Prime Healthcare settles balance-billing lawsuit for $1.2 million
- 'Bad faith' stipulation in Texas medical bill concerns mediators
- California sets rules on length of HMO patient waits
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site Map
| Editors | List in Marketplace | Supplier in MarketplaceTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceEnergy | FierceSmartGrid | FierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceHealthPayer | FiercePracticeManagement | FierceEMR | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceGovernment | FierceHomelandSecurity | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceMedicalDevices | FierceDrugDelivery | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceEnterpriseCommunications | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe | FierceCable© 2011 FierceMarkets. All rights reserved. |
![]() |
