FierceHealthcareFierceHealthITFierceHealthFinanceHospital Impact   FiercePharmaFierceBiotechFierceSarbox
About | Sample | Privacy

Bill would create federal research institute

Tools
Tags
Surgical Procedures
Senate Finance Committee
Private Payers
Practice Patterns
medical devices
Gail Wilensky
Comparative Effectiveness

A new bill has been introduced in the Senate that would create a central federal agency tasked with researching the benefits of various procedures in treating common medical conditions. The bill caps more than a year of discussion and hearings on the Hill on the topic of creating such an agency, which is backed by several high-profile public health experts, including former HCFA (now CMS) administrator Gail Wilensky.

The current bill, backed by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) and Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-ND), establishes the Health Care Comparative Effectiveness Research Institute. The Institute would be a public-private partnership that would conduct research on surgical procedures, pharmaceuticals, medical devices and other key treatments. Its board would include doctors, patients and drug and device maker representatives. The center, whose annual costs should exceed $300 million after five years, would be paid for by fees from public and private payers, and would operate outside of the government.

To learn more about the proposed center:
- read this Modern Healthcare piece (reg. req.)

Related Articles:
SPOTLIGHT: Progress on comparative effectiveness program
Feds study care effectiveness, practice patterns

Comments

This is an idea whose time has come. In every other industry, information technology is used to sift through raw data on a scale that the human brain cannot, in order to "see" the patterns in that data. All of the players in the healthcare system can benefit from an approach that looks through the patient history data, inclusive of symptoms, treatments and results to determine optimal treatment protocols in the future. That is not to say, however, that all players will support such an effort. Again, other industries show this same dynamic. The benefits of this approach will win carry the day in the end. I only hope this can happen sooner rather than later.

I don't believe the purpose of this new federal institute is to promote health IT in optimal patient care, as Tom commented above. At first it may also seem the purpose of this organization is to produce optimal clinical guidelines for patient care - this is also not likely to be the case since optimal medical guidelines are constantly being updated by medical/health researchers. The core function of this new entity will likely be focused on cutting medical costs by identifying cost-effective vs. cost-ineffective treatments. Not quite as noble an effort (although a necessary one) as they're trying to make it seem, and it's funny to note that nowhere in the institute's name (Health Care Comparative Effectiveness Research Institute) does the word "Cost" appear.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

What is 48 + 45?
To combat spam, please solve the math question above.