A new Connecticut law which will make health plans define "medical necessity" in policies is headed to the state's governor for signature. In reality, the bill isn't much of a ground-breaker--insurers typically offer standard medical necessity in policies--but it comes as part of a more aggressive longer-term effort to make insurers defend their medical necessity decisions. Under the original bill, if a member appealed a rejection, the insurer would have had to demonstrate why a treatment wasn't necessary. Right now, under the current system, doctors and patients have to prove the treatment is necessary. This continues to be a cause of tremendous friction between doctors and managed care plans, with doctors taking serious issue [1] with the standards health plans have set.
To learn more about the bill:
- read this Hartford Courant article [2]
Links:
[1] http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/story/blues-reach-128m-settlement-with-mds/2007-04-30
[2] http://www.courant.com/news/local/hc-ctlegbriefs0518.artmay18,0,7972638.story?coll=hc-headlines-local