Most Popular Stories
- Online tools, social media ease clinical recruiting, research
- Health technology for astronauts has earthly potential
- Measuring ROI key to EHR success, adoption
- eHealth Initiative issues IT recommendations for ACOs
- Indiana HIE, AT&T partnership could serve as national model
- Are EHRs being used to stifle physicians?
Featured Jobs
-
ICD-10 Revenue Cycle, Manager
Meditology Services - Atlanta, GA -
Electronic Health Records Application Support Manager RN-New Year New Career
Avanti on behalf of Respected Health System - San Francisco, CA -
Epic Ambulatory Beacon Consultant
Meditology Services - NC
Events
- 3rd Healthcare IT Innovation Asia
Mar 14-15 2012 — Singapore - AHIP's Institute 2012
June 20-22 — Salt Lake City, UT - IHI's Breakthrough Series College
April 11-13, 2012 — Cambridge, MA - Medicare Risk Adjusted Revenue and Plan Payments
April 12 - 13, 2012 — Baltimore, MD
Paid Research Reports
- Electronic health records: getting it right first time
- Cloud Computing Adoption In The APAC Life Sciences Industry
- Stakeholder Opinions: Ophthalmology - Leading brands under threat
- Genomics, Proteomics and Metabolomics in Diagnostics: Market landscape, innovative technologies and future outlook
- Healthcare Regulatory Update: The United Arab Emirates
- Point of Care Testing: Evaluating the return to evidence based medicine, novel technologies and the competitive landscape
Free Newsletter
FierceHealthcare is the leading source of healthcare management news for healthcare industry executives. Join 50,000+ healthcare industry insiders who get FierceHealthcare via daily email. Sign up today!
Popular Topics
SPOTLIGHT: Too soon for Medicare P4P?
November 2, 2006 — 7:01pm ET
Given the rumblings in Washington, it seems certain that Medicare will institute pay for performance measures sometime soon. Armed with in-house studies, CMS execs and policy wonks seem convinced that pay for performance can turn around costs for the hugely expensive public health insurance program. However, critics argue that it's premature to institute P4P measures. After all, they note, the industry still hasn't reached a strong consensus as to what to measure, much less who gets to establish these standards. Article
SHARE WITH:
Related Stories
- Physicians question CMS P4P effort
- CMS tightening quality-reporting measures
- MD groups struggle with Medicare incentive goals
- Incentives could boost credit ratings for non-profits
- CMS P4P program shows improvements
- AHA says Medicare P4P proposal would hurt hospitals
- CMS program would base hospital pay on performance
- Medicare plans home health P4P program
- GAO: Medicare HMOs shouldn't have kept money
- Blue Cross of California pays $31M in P4P bonuses
Home
| Subscribe | Advertise | Mobile Edition | RSS |
Privacy
| Site Map
| Editors | List in Marketplace | Supplier in MarketplaceTHE FIERCEMARKETS NETWORKFierceEnergy | FierceSmartGrid | FierceFinance | FierceFinanceIT | FierceComplianceIT | FierceHealthcare | FierceHealthFinance | FierceHealthIT | Hospital Impact | FierceMobileHealthcare | FierceHealthPayer | FiercePracticeManagement | FierceEMR | FierceCIO | FierceCIO:TechWatch | FierceContentManagement | FierceMobileIT | FierceGovernmentIT | FierceGovernment | FierceHomelandSecurity | FierceBiotech | FierceBiotech Research | FiercePharma | FierceVaccines | FierceBiotechIT | FiercePharma Manufacturing | FierceMedicalDevices | FierceDrugDelivery | FierceIPTV | FierceOnlineVideo | FierceTelecom | FierceEnterpriseCommunications | FierceBroadbandWireless | FierceDeveloper | FierceMobileContent | FierceWireless | FierceWireless:Europe | FierceCable© 2011 FierceMarkets. All rights reserved. |
![]() |
