logo
Published on FierceHealthcare (http://www.fiercehealthcare.com)

Editor's Corner

By admin
Created Sep 21 2006 - 8:01pm


For some time now, we've been hearing about problems in the nation's emergency departments, but the issue became all too real this week when a woman died of a heart attack after waiting two hours to be treated [1]. It's very likely that her death could have been avoided had she been treated promptly. And since her death, some doctors have noted that it was only a matter of time until ER overcrowding caught up with healthcare providers.

The less-than-ideal situation in emergency departments is the result of a number of factors: there are fewer people with insurance due to high premium costs, a greater number of immigrants, homeless and indigent patients are using the ER, and the aging baby boomer population requires more care. Most of these factors are beyond a hospital's immediate control, and in the long term, all must be addressed. However, many hospitals have taken steps to do what they can to reduce wait times and/or ease overcrowding of ERs.

There are numerous other examples of hospitals doing what they can to manage ER overcrowding. All of these measures point to the fact that emergency departments are becoming increasingly selective in who they'll treat and how they'll treat them. And that's not a bad thing. Refining the guidelines of who's admitted to the ER relieves pressure on overworked staff and allows patients to receive faster care elsewhere. It also saves a lot of money that can then be re-invested into the system. Having processes in place to handle special cases--such as cardiac disease--helps healthcare providers administer faster, better care. Hospitals may have to wait a long time before the underlying problems that cause ER overcrowding are solved, but taking action now to improve emergency processes could save a lot of lives in the meantime. -Maureen [6]


Source URL:
http://www.fiercehealthcare.com/story/editor-s-corner/2006-09-22